General Commissioners of Income Tax: Cleveland and North Yorkshire Division

Lord Gladwin of Clee: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What are their proposals for the amalgamations of divisions of the General Commissioners of Income Tax in Cleveland and North Yorkshire.

Lord Irvine of Lairg: On 1 October 2002, I made an order under section 2(6) of the Taxes Management Act 1970 amalgamating divisions in both North Yorkshire and Cleveland as follows. The Hartlepool and Stockton divisions shall be merged into one new division to be called Hartlepool with Stockton; and the Teesside South and Langbaurgh divisions shall be merged into a new division called Teesside South with Langbaurgh. The amalgamation was made at the request of the General Commissioners in all of the divisions with the aim of improving the organisational efficiency of the divisions in the counties of Cleveland and North Yorkshire. I have placed a copy of the order amalgamating the divisions in the Library of this House.

Extradition

Lord Howell of Guildford: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they accept the validity, under Article 99, Paragraph 2, of the Rome Statute setting up the International Criminal Court, of bilateral agreements being sought by the Government of the United States regarding the extradition of potential criminal defendants and their exemption from the requirements of the International Criminal Court.

Baroness Amos: I refer the noble Lord to the Answer I gave my noble and learned friend Lord Archer of Sandwell on 14 October (Official Report, cols. 592-93).

Zimbabwe: EU Sanctions Policy

Lord Elton: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether Zimbabwe's Trade Minister, Samuel Mumbengegwi, was in Brussels on 24 September; whether his presence there at that time was in breach of European Union sanctions policy; and, if not, under what provision of that policy he was admitted.

Baroness Amos: We understand that Mr Mumbengegwi was in Brussels on 24 September. His presence was not in breach of the EU's sanctions policy. The EU's Common Position 2002/145/CFSP imposing sanctions on Zimbabwe specifically allows member states to grant exemptions where travel is justified on grounds of attending meetings of international bodies. Under the terms of the Lome/Cotonou arrangements, Belgium had a legal obligation to grant Mr Mumbengegwi a visa so that he could attend the EU/ACP trade talks in Brussels which took place from 23 to 27 September. The Belgians consulted EU partners on 18 September about the issue of a visa to Mumbengegwi. In doing so, they undertook to attach maximum restrictions to any visa issued to him. We are satisfied that they did so. The visa was restricted to the territory of Belgium (Mumbengegwi was not permitted to travel through the Schengen area), and for a very short period (22 to 29 September).

Zimbabwe: EU Sanctions Policy

Lord Elton: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What representations they have made to the Government of Belgium about their permitting Zimbabwe's Trade Minister, Samuel Mumbengegwi, to enter Belgium several days ahead of a European Union/African, Caribbean and Pacific meeting convened there for 27 September when European Union sanctions policy allowed him entry only for the purpose of attending that meeting.

Baroness Amos: The EU/ACP meeting was from 23 to 27 September. Our understanding is that the Belgian Government issued Mr Mumbengegwi with a visa from 22 to 29 September. Belgium consulted EU partners prior to issuing the visa, as they are required to do, under the EU's Common Position 2002/145/CFSP. They undertook to attach maximum restrictions to any visa issued to Mr Mumbengegwi. We are satisfied that they did so: the visa was issued for a very short period covering the meeting, and was restricted to the territory of Belgium (Mumbengegwi was not permitted to travel through the Schengen area). No representations have therefore been made.

Zimbabwe: EU Sanctions Policy

Lord Elton: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they consider European Union sanctions against the Government of Zimbabwe to be effective; if so, what effect they are having on the Government of Zimbabwe; and, if not, what steps they are taking to make sanctions effective.

Baroness Amos: EU sanctions are having an impact. The travel ban bars ZANU(PF) Ministers, politburo members and other key figures in the Mugabe regime from conducting normal business in Europe (for example when ZANU(PF) Local Government Minister, Ignatius Chombo, was refused entry to the UK at Gatwick airport on 5 October). The EU assets freeze has frozen 24 accounts containing funds totalling £123,000 of individual assets in the UK. The sanctions help to increase the regime's moral and political isolation. They have twice been extended since they were introduced on 18 February 2002. We and our EU partners keep the measures under constant review, with an eye for further extension.

Commonwealth: Member States' Constitutions

Lord Laird: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Which members of the Commonwealth must refer constitutional change to them for ratification; and, in each case, what type of change is involved.

Baroness Amos: No member state of the Commonwealth need refer any constitutional amendment to the UK Government for ratification as membership of the organisation is confined to sovereign states.

Mandatory Life Sentence Prisoners: ECHR Judgment

Lord Hughes of Woodside: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What procedural changes are being made following the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 May in the case of Stafford concerning the release of mandatory life sentence prisoners.

Lord Falconer of Thoroton: Mandatory life sentence prisoners who have served the minimum period necessary to satisfy the requirements of retribution and deterrence have their cases reviewed periodically by the Parole Board. At present responsibility for their release rests with the Secretary of State. This responsibility cannot be conferred on the Parole Board or any other body without primary legislation.
	As an interim measure, the Home Secretary has decided to change the administrative arrangements for the review and release of mandatory life sentence prisoners. These administrative arrangements will apply to all such prisoners whose next Parole Board review begins on or after 1 January 2003. The changes will mean that in most instances these prisoners' cases will be heard initially, as now, by the Parole Board on the papers which will make a provisional recommendation. If prisoners wish to make representations about provisional recommendations it will then be open to them to request an oral hearing before the Parole Board at which they may have legal representation. They will normally receive full disclosure of all material relevant to the question of whether they should be released. They will also be able to examine and cross-examine witnesses. Similarly the Secretary of State may also require an oral hearing of the board in cases where he believes further examination of the evidence is required.
	If, at the end of the review process, the Parole Board favours the release of a mandatory life sentence prisoner once the minimum period has been served the Home Secretary will normally accept such a recommendation.
	The Stafford judgement affects only the process by which the decision is made on whether to release mandatory life sentence prisoners. It does not relate to the period of detention which such prisoners must serve to satisfy the requirements of retribution and deterrence, or Parole Board reviews that take place before the end of that period. There will usually be no change to the dates set for Parole Board reviews of prisoners who have served that period. Those prisoners serving whole life tariffs do not have their cases referred to the Parole Board.

Afghanistan: Asylum Seekers

Lord Lea of Crondall: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What arrangements he has made for the return to Afghanistan of those not in need of international protection.

Lord Filkin: A tripartite agreement by the Government, the Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was signed on Saturday 12 October 2002 in Kabul following the successful conclusion of negotiations. The agreement provides for return to Afghanistan in a managed and phased manner of those who have been established to have no protection needs. The United Kingdom is fully committed to the reconstruction of Afghanistan. As part of this it is important that return to Afghanistan is sustainable, and the agreement commits the United Kingdom Government to providing support to those returning, in Afghanistan, to ensure they are able to re-establish themselves in their homeland.

Reserve Forces

Lord Tomlinson: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether members of the Reserve Forces will continue to support operations as part of the campaign against international terrorism.

Lord Bach: With the expiry of the call-out order made last October, a new order has been made to enable reservists to continue to be called out into service to support military operations in Afghanistan and related operations arising as part of the campaign against international terrorism. The new order is effective until 30 September 2003. Over 500 reservists were called out under the order made last October, of whom over half were called out compulsorily. The reservists are providing an invaluable contribution to the operations and we are most grateful for their continuing commitment and their employers' support.

EU Disaster Relief and Rehabilitation Funding

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Following the recent public statements of the President of the European Commission that, pending establishment of a new fund within the European Community relating to disaster relief and rehabilitation, flood grants can be made available from its regional funds, what Community instruments or procedures are available for applications from, and payments to, national, as distinct from regional, bodies.

Lord Sainsbury of Turville: Any application from a national body for structural fund support would normally need to be submitted at a regional level using the existing procedures. In the event of all or most regions in a member state being affected, the government of the member state concerned could make a consolidated application. This would be presented to the Commission via the member state's Permanent Representative to the European Union.
	The use of European regional funding is a temporary measure while the modalities of the new fund are being discussed.

3G Services

Lord Lester of Herne Hill: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they consider it desirable to allow European wireless operators to choose whether to provide 3G services using technology other than W-CDMA.

Lord Sainsbury of Turville: The UK 3G licensees, all of whom freely chose W-CDMA as their preferred technology, have not requested consideration of another technology. W-CDMA is a logical progression from the successful GSM technology now in widespread use throughout the UK and Europe.

The Ridgeway

Lord Avebury: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What is the timetable for consultations on the management group's recommendations for the Ridgeway; and whether this will be advertised in the local press and on local radio.

Lord Whitty: The report containing the management group's recommendations for the Ridgeway will be published on the National Trails website by Monday 21 October. The Countryside Agency will be issuing a press release about the recommendations on 29 October, which will be issued to the local press.
	A public meeting will be held on 19 November at Didcot Civic Hall to discuss the results and implications for the Ridgeway and its users. A wider consultation will follow, ending on 3 January 2003.
	My right honourable friend, the Minister for Rural Affairs and Urban Quality of Life (Alun Michael) intends to visit the Ridgeway soon to talk to interested parties including the noble Lord about future action.

Brixham Marina

Lord Corbett of Castle Vale: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they will ensure that regular health and safety inspections are made of the Brixham Marina Wave Screen.

Baroness Hollis of Heigham: The Health and Safety Executive is not the enforcing authority for Brixham marina, this is the responsibility of Torbay Council.

European Year of Disabled People 2003

Baroness Greengross: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What plans they have now agreed for the European Year of Disabled People 2003.

Baroness Hollis of Heigham: We have agreed an overall plan for the year, including a theme, "Promoting Rights and Participation," funding, and a competitive bidding process for projects at local, regional and national level. We expect to announce the successful projects before the year starts.
	Launch events are being planned for England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. These will be held in January 2003.

Gambling Reform

Lord Acton: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	When they next expect to publish information relating to gambling reform.

Baroness Blackstone: We have today laid before both Houses a Command Paper (No. 5622) setting out the Government's response to the report of the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, The Government's Proposals For Gambling: Nothing To Lose?

Questions for Written Answer

Lord Jopling: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Privy Seal on 25 July (WA 125), what steps are being taken to draw the attention of those ministers concerned to the failure of their departments to answer the 13 Written Questions tabled before the Summer Recess seven days after the resumed sitting on Monday 14 October, contrary to the Lord Privy Seal's assurance that he would make every effort to ensure that the Answers would appear in the Official Report for Monday 7 October.

Lord Williams of Mostyn: I have today reviewed the outstanding questions with ministerial colleagues. I also reviewed progress at meetings of the Government Front Bench on 25 July and 10 October. On 18 September the Front Bench discussed the steps being taken by departments with the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Andrew Turnbull.
	My office has monitored progress in the answering of these Questions. They have been in constant touch with contacts in departmental parliamentary branches, have sent regular reports to departments, and have met with their contacts to discuss procedures and progress.
	I regret that not all of the 264 Written Questions tabled before the Summer Recess appeared in the Official Report on Monday 7 October, and that six of the Questions to which the noble Lord refers remain outstanding as of today. I continue to look at further ways of improving this performance.

Questions for Written Answer

Lord Jopling: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they will explain, in each case, what were the difficulties which prevented the 13 Questions for Written Answer which were tabled before the Summer Recess from being answered before 14 October when between 11 and 17 weeks had passed, contrary to the obligation on departments to answer within two weeks.

Lord Williams of Mostyn: I regret that not all of the Questions for Written Answer tabled before the Recess have been answered.
	I am currently looking into why 13 Questions remained unanswered on 14 October and I shall write to the noble Lord with the details. A copy of the letter will be placed in the Library of the House.